Explore the history of competing conceptions of scientific knowledge over issues such as evolution from the onset of the Scientific Revolution in the 1600s to the present.
Science Wars: What Scientists Know and How They Know It
Explore the history of competing conceptions of scientific knowledge with a noted professor from Lehigh University.
Rated 5 out of
5
by
ScottTheSculptor from
Describes the schizophrenia of science perfectly
The Particle-Field of Scientists-Science described from either end of the political extremes. Presenter has totally bought the "stretchy space, non-causal quantum" model of the "authorities" (without understanding it himself), then argues that the authorties are correct simply because they agree. Math only predicts, only accurate predictions "prove" science. Predicting things that only gang members care about and only affect *you* if you are in the gang... is "advanced science" that you need to spend six figures on your education and certification... to get a six figure salary. The royalty of science need high paying salaries. So that they can predict things that do not affect you.
Date published: 2023-08-16
Rated 3 out of
5
by
kalb from
philosophy trying to make believe it's science
To a degree, the course reminds me of the endless, meaningless, self-serving bull sessions in college. Though here, a bit loftier in concept. The course wavers between interesting & thought provoking at times (too infrequently) on one hand, & boring pseudo intellectual gibberish on the other hand. Professor Goldman's enthusiasm has him too often start a sentence & then in the middle of it, go off in tangents. In lecture #23, where he refutes intelligent design, while i'm no supporter of the religious fiction of intelligent design, i believe Prof Goldman unfairly misses the mark in attacking intelligent design's often response to "how" by its response "god did it" by his arguing that such a response is not a response. Indeed it is - perhaps a cop out, perhaps too simplistic, but it is the standard religion based response, & must be accepted as such.
Date published: 2023-07-26
Rated 5 out of
5
by
ggreene from
Facinating discussion of how science "works"
Discusses interaction of history of science & philosophy of science, focused on question of how scientific knowledge evolves, as new theories about what "really is" supercede older ones. Very interesting, & insightful analyses of both scientific inquiry & how it can be constructively understood.
Date published: 2023-04-12
Rated 5 out of
5
by
ScienceLoverinTX from
EXCELLENT account of philosophy of science
Dr. Goldman has a communicative gift in explaining the complex nature of scientific reasoning and the philosophical context in which science has evolved over the centuries. His insights are transformative and empowering about what you (and scientists) THINK they know, and how knowledge, truth, rationality, and reasoning are rather equivocal by nature. I have watched this lecture series over and over again, and each time, I learn something new. His students at Lehigh University are incredibly lucky! I also recommend Dr. Goldman's lectures entitled Science in the 20th Century. It is equally engaging and enlightening! Anyone looking to better understand the big picture of reality must watch these two lecture series. Thank you, Dr. Goldman!
Date published: 2022-05-19
Rated 5 out of
5
by
Michael Ireland from
Perfect intro to history and philosophy of science
I've listened to this course several times now. It's magnificent.
Date published: 2021-12-18
Rated 5 out of
5
by
Dan P from
Excellent history of the Philosophy of Science
Lots to unpack in this course. It can be hard to follow at times, but if you take your time to listen carefully to what Dr. Goldman has to say, I believe it is worth it. The course spends most of its time discussing the philosophical underpinnings of science, focusing on the nature of "knowledge claims" that science makes. Dr. Goldman argues very effectively and obviously knows the material very well.
Date published: 2021-12-13
Rated 4 out of
5
by
Anion2 from
Good Course on the Philosophy of Science
The lecturer was very good and certainly knew his stuff. However, I found it difficult times to keep up with him even though I am a trained scientist. The delivery was very rapidly and it was hard to absorb the material. I had to read the guidebook before and after the lectures.
Date published: 2021-08-25
Rated 3 out of
5
by
tonyou91 from
More about Scientific Objectivity than ScienceWars
This is a review of whether scientific knowledge is objective, and takes 21 lectures, starting from Aristotle, to get there. Finally, in lecture 22, the Science Wars are discussed, and seem like a damp squib. Lecture 23 is about "Intelligent Design" and lecture 24 is on the professor's take on the subject.
So, if you are interested in what people have said about the existence or not of scientific objectivity over many centuries, the course is for you. If you want to know specifically about the science wars of the 1990s, or even the debate in the late 20th century, find something else.
(space for review titles is limited, hence two words run together)
Date published: 2021-05-16
Overview
About
Dr. Steven L. Goldman is the Andrew W. Mellon Distinguished Professor in the Humanities at Lehigh University, where he has taught for 30 years. He earned his B.S. in Physics at the Polytechnic University of New York and his M.A. and Ph.D. in Philosophy from Boston University.
Before taking his position at Lehigh, Professor Goldman taught at The Pennsylvania State University, where he was a cofounder of one of the first U.S. academic programs in science, technology, and society studies.
Professor Goldman has received the Lindback Distinguished Teaching Award from Lehigh University. A prolific author, he has written or edited eight books, including Science, Technology, and Social Progress, and he has an impressive list of scholarly articles and reviews to his credit. He has been a national lecturer for the scientific research society Sigma Xi and a national program consultant for the National Endowment for the Humanities.
01: Knowledge and Truth Are Age-Old Problems
What is it that scientists know, and how do they know what they know? The "science wars" in the late 20th century were a dispute within modern science that signals a deep, longstanding conflict over this question....
32 min
02: Competing Visions of the Scientific Method
This lecture casts doubt on the popular notion that the rise of modern science in the early 17th century was the result of discovering a single method for extracting objective truths about nature from subjective experience....
30 min
03: Galileo, the Catholic Church, and Truth
The Catholic Church has been cast as villain in its condemnation of Galileo, but a great deal hinges on whether Galileo possessed knowledge and was defending truth, or was promoting personal opinions based on his beliefs....
30 min
04: Isaac Newton's Theory of the Universe
Isaac Newton's mathematical theory of gravity and motion works, and for more than 200 years was lauded as finally giving knowledge of physical reality. But Newtonian physics is wrong, in spite of "working."...
31 min
05: Science vs. Philosophy in the 17th Century
From the beginning, modern science used novel instruments that disclosed realities that cannot be experienced directly. But the very novelty of these instruments raised questions about what it was they revealed....
31 min
06: Locke, Hume, and the Path to Skepticism
John Locke formulated the classic empirical theory of knowledge, while George Berkeley mounted a vigorous attack on modern science, and David Hume embraced skepticism, criticizing unjustifiable knowledge claims....
31 min
07: Kant Restores Certainty
Immanuel Kant invented a philosophical system that guaranteed universal, necessary, and certain knowledge, but at a price. We could have knowledge of experience, but not of the world as it "really" is, beyond experience....
31 min
08: Science, Society, and the Age of Reason
The role that scientific knowledge plays in society today is the realization of the 18th-century Enlightenment vision linking social reform and the idea of progress to reason by way of science....
31 min
09: Science Comes of Age in the 19th Century
In spite of science's growing applicability to the real world through technology, scientists began to question the relationship between theories and reality, influenced by such startling ideas as non-Euclidean geometry....
31 min
10: Theories Need Not Explain
Joseph Fourier and others showed that a theory can provide prediction and control without describing realities behind experience. But then as now, the dominant view was that scientific theories reveal what is really out there....
32 min
11: Knowledge As a Product of the Active Mind
William Whewell invented the term "scientist" and tried to demonstrate that creative activity by the mind is a fundamental factor in scientific reasoning, and that the history of science is crucial in understanding this process....
31 min
12: Trading Reality for Experience
This lecture looks at thinkers as diverse as Ernst Mach, Pierre Duhem, and Heinrich Hertz, who argued from three different perspectives that theories were non-unique interpretations of experience, not descriptions of reality....
31 min
13: Scientific Truth in the Early 20th Century
Ironically, just as science increasingly mattered to the general public, and for that reason scientific knowledge was accepted as true, the 19th-century scientific theories responsible for this perception were being discarded!...
32 min
14: Two New Theories of Scientific Knowledge
The most proscience philosophies in the first half of the 20th century were logical positivism, which embraced the primacy of scientific knowledge, and pragmatism, a homegrown American philosophy that rejected it....
32 min
15: Einstein and Bohr Redefine Reality
Relativity and quantum theory raised new questions about the relationship of science to reality. This lecture addresses these questions, which continue unresolved to this day....
32 min
16: Truth, Ideology, and Thought Collectives
The most radical theory of scientific knowledge to be formulated in the 1930s came from immunologist Ludwik Fleck, who used the history of syphilis as a vehicle for exploring what scientists know and how they know it....
32 min
17: Kuhn's Revolutionary Image of Science
The 1962 publication of Thomas Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions sparked a reassessment by intellectuals of the privileged status of scientific knowledge and more broadly of the possibility of true objectivity....
32 min
18: Challenging Mainstream Science from Within
Scientific thinking has a collective character shaped by education and professional community life, but scientific theories also evolve, and highly credentialed "outsiders" play a role....
32 min
19: Objectivity Under Attack
Israel Scheffler and Paul Feyerabend assumed opposite stances in response to Kuhn's thesis. Independently, Michel Foucault and Jacques Derrida launched an attack on the very possibility of objective knowledge....
32 min
20: Scientific Knowledge as Social Construct
In the 1980s, a consensus formed that scientific and technological knowledge were not value-neutral, but the products of communal practices deeply affected by professional and societal values....
32 min
21: New Definitions of Objectivity
While many intellectuals after 1960 were busily denouncing Western ideals of rationality, knowledge, and truth as politically motivated myths, many philosophers of science proposed defensible theories of scientific realism....
32 min
22: Science Wars of the Late 20th Century
In 1996, a postmodern journal addressed the science wars after a decade of hostility between scientists and supporters of the social construction view. The journal unwittingly published a parody of postmodernism known as Sokal's hoax....
31 min
23: Intelligent Design and the Scope of Science
Is intelligent design a scientific hypothesis? This question highlights issues of who defines what science is, what constitutes good science, and what words like rationality, truth, knowledge, and reality mean....
32 min
24: Truth, History, and Citizenship
At a time when science is involved in profound social, moral, and environmental challenges, misunderstanding the positions of competing interpretations of science is an obstacle to effective action....
33 min
