Science Wars: What Scientists Know and How They Know It

Explore the history of competing conceptions of scientific knowledge with a noted professor from Lehigh University.
Science Wars: What Scientists Know and How They Know It is rated 4.3 out of 5 by 116.
  • y_2021, m_6, d_18, h_18
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_3.0.17
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_5, tr_111
  • loc_en_CA, sid_1235, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_teachco
  • bvseo_sdk, p_sdk, 3.2.1
  • CLOUD, getAggregateRating, 6.5ms
  • REVIEWS, PRODUCT
Rated 3 out of 5 by from More about Scientific Objectivity than ScienceWars This is a review of whether scientific knowledge is objective, and takes 21 lectures, starting from Aristotle, to get there. Finally, in lecture 22, the Science Wars are discussed, and seem like a damp squib. Lecture 23 is about "Intelligent Design" and lecture 24 is on the professor's take on the subject. So, if you are interested in what people have said about the existence or not of scientific objectivity over many centuries, the course is for you. If you want to know specifically about the science wars of the 1990s, or even the debate in the late 20th century, find something else. (space for review titles is limited, hence two words run together)
Date published: 2021-05-16
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Brilliant, exhilarating, and vitally important. If more people understood the content of this course, many of society's problems would be much easier to deal with. A better title might be "What Scientist Can Know and How They Know It." Those expecting a summary of current scientific knowledge (which would be an impossible endeavor) might be disappointed. Those who have absolutely no knowledge of how science is done and no knowledge of philosophy might find the course challenging. For anyone who knows a bit about scientific methods and is willing to pay attention, this course is invaluable. This course might be considered more of a philosophy course than a science course, but every scientist (and every citizen) should be aware of the the philosophical underpinnings and often unrecognized assumptions and limitations inherent in the practice of science.
Date published: 2021-04-30
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Very well taught Ever since I was assigned to read The Structure of Scientific Revolution, along with the rest of my incoming freshman class at the University of Chicago, I have been interested in the history and philosophy of science, but have never pursued it in any formal manner. This course, though now 15 years old, greatly increased my understanding of science as a system and source of knowledge, as well as satisfying my curiosity about the "social construction of science" controversy of a few years ago. Professor Goldmann is a terrific lecturer and the course handbook is an excellent resource for reviewing what he says.
Date published: 2021-04-01
Rated 5 out of 5 by from The best lecture series I have ever attended! Prof. Goldman is a phenomenal educator. Once he starts talking, I am completely hooked as if I am watching a thriller! The historic narration and how he relates different scientists at different centuries is really well explained and gives you a very clear perspective.
Date published: 2020-12-18
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Beautifully executed by masterful teacher This professor is so very adept at presenting this subject. I have watched it twice, some parts 3 times. I wish i were as effective a teacher as he.
Date published: 2020-09-18
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Historical thinking in science. Excellent Professor and enlightening course content.
Date published: 2020-03-02
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Not enough real-world examples. It's a bit hard to follow all the philosophizing when the concepts are not related to something we can comprehend in the physical realm. Goldman does give some real-world examples as he goes along, but not nearly enough. Therefore I find I sometimes just give up and skip to the next lecture.
Date published: 2019-09-29
Rated 5 out of 5 by from extraordinarily good Whoever is interested in the development of the philosophy of science, everyone a bit critical amongst scientist and people interested in science, everyone who wants to know from which assumptions he or she starts looking at science without being aware of it,all of them should buy this course,its fascinating in every aspect-and dont forget to also listen to the philosophy of science course by another professor..If You have made it through this two you will see science in a new light..satisfaction guaranteed
Date published: 2019-09-15
  • y_2021, m_6, d_18, h_18
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_3.0.17
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_5, tr_111
  • loc_en_CA, sid_1235, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_teachco
  • bvseo_sdk, p_sdk, 3.2.1
  • CLOUD, getReviews, 4.67ms
  • REVIEWS, PRODUCT

Overview

Explore the history of competing conceptions of scientific knowledge over issues such as evolution from the onset of the Scientific Revolution in the 1600s to the present.

About

Steven L. Goldman
Steven L. Goldman

After 50 years, I continue to find new depths and fresh excitement in studying the history and philosophy of science.

INSTITUTION

Lehigh University

Dr. Steven L. Goldman is the Andrew W. Mellon Distinguished Professor in the Humanities at Lehigh University, where he has taught for 30 years. He earned his B.S. in Physics at the Polytechnic University of New York and his M.A. and Ph.D. in Philosophy from Boston University.

Before taking his position at Lehigh, Professor Goldman taught at The Pennsylvania State University, where he was a cofounder of one of the first U.S. academic programs in science, technology, and society studies.

Professor Goldman has received the Lindback Distinguished Teaching Award from Lehigh University. A prolific author, he has written or edited eight books, including Science, Technology, and Social Progress, and he has an impressive list of scholarly articles and reviews to his credit. He has been a national lecturer for the scientific research society Sigma Xi and a national program consultant for the National Endowment for the Humanities.

By This Professor

Knowledge and Truth Are Age-Old Problems

01: Knowledge and Truth Are Age-Old Problems

What is it that scientists know, and how do they know what they know? The "science wars" in the late 20th century were a dispute within modern science that signals a deep, longstanding conflict over this question....

32 min
Competing Visions of the Scientific Method

02: Competing Visions of the Scientific Method

This lecture casts doubt on the popular notion that the rise of modern science in the early 17th century was the result of discovering a single method for extracting objective truths about nature from subjective experience....

30 min
Galileo, the Catholic Church, and Truth

03: Galileo, the Catholic Church, and Truth

The Catholic Church has been cast as villain in its condemnation of Galileo, but a great deal hinges on whether Galileo possessed knowledge and was defending truth, or was promoting personal opinions based on his beliefs....

30 min
Isaac Newton's Theory of the Universe

04: Isaac Newton's Theory of the Universe

Isaac Newton's mathematical theory of gravity and motion works, and for more than 200 years was lauded as finally giving knowledge of physical reality. But Newtonian physics is wrong, in spite of "working."...

31 min
Science vs. Philosophy in the 17th Century

05: Science vs. Philosophy in the 17th Century

From the beginning, modern science used novel instruments that disclosed realities that cannot be experienced directly. But the very novelty of these instruments raised questions about what it was they revealed....

31 min
Locke, Hume, and the Path to Skepticism

06: Locke, Hume, and the Path to Skepticism

John Locke formulated the classic empirical theory of knowledge, while George Berkeley mounted a vigorous attack on modern science, and David Hume embraced skepticism, criticizing unjustifiable knowledge claims....

31 min
Kant Restores Certainty

07: Kant Restores Certainty

Immanuel Kant invented a philosophical system that guaranteed universal, necessary, and certain knowledge, but at a price. We could have knowledge of experience, but not of the world as it "really" is, beyond experience....

31 min
Science, Society, and the Age of Reason

08: Science, Society, and the Age of Reason

The role that scientific knowledge plays in society today is the realization of the 18th-century Enlightenment vision linking social reform and the idea of progress to reason by way of science....

31 min
Science Comes of Age in the 19th Century

09: Science Comes of Age in the 19th Century

In spite of science's growing applicability to the real world through technology, scientists began to question the relationship between theories and reality, influenced by such startling ideas as non-Euclidean geometry....

31 min
Theories Need Not Explain

10: Theories Need Not Explain

Joseph Fourier and others showed that a theory can provide prediction and control without describing realities behind experience. But then as now, the dominant view was that scientific theories reveal what is really out there....

32 min
Knowledge As a Product of the Active Mind

11: Knowledge As a Product of the Active Mind

William Whewell invented the term "scientist" and tried to demonstrate that creative activity by the mind is a fundamental factor in scientific reasoning, and that the history of science is crucial in understanding this process....

31 min
Trading Reality for Experience

12: Trading Reality for Experience

This lecture looks at thinkers as diverse as Ernst Mach, Pierre Duhem, and Heinrich Hertz, who argued from three different perspectives that theories were non-unique interpretations of experience, not descriptions of reality....

31 min
Scientific Truth in the Early 20th Century

13: Scientific Truth in the Early 20th Century

Ironically, just as science increasingly mattered to the general public, and for that reason scientific knowledge was accepted as true, the 19th-century scientific theories responsible for this perception were being discarded!...

32 min
Two New Theories of Scientific Knowledge

14: Two New Theories of Scientific Knowledge

The most proscience philosophies in the first half of the 20th century were logical positivism, which embraced the primacy of scientific knowledge, and pragmatism, a homegrown American philosophy that rejected it....

32 min
Einstein and Bohr Redefine Reality

15: Einstein and Bohr Redefine Reality

Relativity and quantum theory raised new questions about the relationship of science to reality. This lecture addresses these questions, which continue unresolved to this day....

32 min
Truth, Ideology, and Thought Collectives

16: Truth, Ideology, and Thought Collectives

The most radical theory of scientific knowledge to be formulated in the 1930s came from immunologist Ludwik Fleck, who used the history of syphilis as a vehicle for exploring what scientists know and how they know it....

32 min
Kuhn's Revolutionary Image of Science

17: Kuhn's Revolutionary Image of Science

The 1962 publication of Thomas Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions sparked a reassessment by intellectuals of the privileged status of scientific knowledge and more broadly of the possibility of true objectivity....

32 min
Challenging Mainstream Science from Within

18: Challenging Mainstream Science from Within

Scientific thinking has a collective character shaped by education and professional community life, but scientific theories also evolve, and highly credentialed "outsiders" play a role....

32 min
Objectivity Under Attack

19: Objectivity Under Attack

Israel Scheffler and Paul Feyerabend assumed opposite stances in response to Kuhn's thesis. Independently, Michel Foucault and Jacques Derrida launched an attack on the very possibility of objective knowledge....

32 min
Scientific Knowledge as Social Construct

20: Scientific Knowledge as Social Construct

In the 1980s, a consensus formed that scientific and technological knowledge were not value-neutral, but the products of communal practices deeply affected by professional and societal values....

32 min
New Definitions of Objectivity

21: New Definitions of Objectivity

While many intellectuals after 1960 were busily denouncing Western ideals of rationality, knowledge, and truth as politically motivated myths, many philosophers of science proposed defensible theories of scientific realism....

32 min
Science Wars of the Late 20th Century

22: Science Wars of the Late 20th Century

In 1996, a postmodern journal addressed the science wars after a decade of hostility between scientists and supporters of the social construction view. The journal unwittingly published a parody of postmodernism known as Sokal's hoax....

31 min
Intelligent Design and the Scope of Science

23: Intelligent Design and the Scope of Science

Is intelligent design a scientific hypothesis? This question highlights issues of who defines what science is, what constitutes good science, and what words like rationality, truth, knowledge, and reality mean....

32 min
Truth, History, and Citizenship

24: Truth, History, and Citizenship

At a time when science is involved in profound social, moral, and environmental challenges, misunderstanding the positions of competing interpretations of science is an obstacle to effective action....

33 min